Boyette v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellant was convicted by a jury of delivery of cocaine. Appellant argued on appeal he was denied his constitutional right to counsel during a critical stage of the proceedings. Specifically, Appellant complained he was not represented by counsel during the time period between the imposition of his sentence and the expiration of the thirty day deadline for filing a motion for new trial. The Court of Appeals agreed, suspended the requirements of former Tex.R.App. P. 31(a), abated the appeal, and remanded the case to the trial court so that Appellant could, with the aid of counsel, file…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Oldham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Boyette v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
4Cited by8 opinions
- Garcia v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
- Champion v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2002
- Boyette v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
- Joe Garcia v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
- Joe Garcia v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.