Legal Opinion

Rauch v. Immel, Partners

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1936PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By MIDDLETON, PJ.

We do not regard it necessary in disposing of this case to call attention to all of the facts in evidence or to the various contentions of the parties in respect to the facts. It is our conclusion that under certain admitted facts the rights of the parties herein may be definitely determined.

It appears from the record that on March 25, 1931, Abdul W. Immel and George R. Immel brought an action against Harry W. Leeper, Frank X. Rouch, Fred G. Sands, Fred D. Forsyth and the Leeper Craig Company as defendants in the Court of Common Pleas, which action was duly numbered as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ukrainian American Building & Loan Ass'n v. SzuranOhio Court of Appeals · 1931

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Starbuck v. EsparzaWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. National Packaging Corp. v. BelmontOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Waicker v. BaneguraCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  4. Luper v. Beam's Security (In re Lee Way Holding Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API