Legal Opinion

Starbuck v. Esparza

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1992No. 57337-9PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrachtenbach, J.

The United States Bankruptcy Court judge for the Eastern District of Washington certified five questions of unsettled Washington law; the questions arose in a Chapter 12 bankruptcy proceeding and from an allied adversary proceeding in that court. RCW 2.60; RAP 16.16.

The Order of Certification lists 20 documents and records which the bankruptcy judge deemed material for our consideration. Order of Certification, at 4-5.

Also, we note that the bankruptcy court has held:(1) That; as against the bankruptcy estate of Cipriano Esparza, et ux., the statutory landlord Hen held by Tucker Starbuck is…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hubner v. ReickhoffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  2. Goldstine v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1955
  3. State v. . ReynoldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  4. United States v. Dale Smith, Suzanne Smith, Gordon E. Mills and Sharon R. MillsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  5. Kelly v. KuhnhausenWashington Supreme Court · 1908

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Food Services of America v. Royal Heights, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Dobbins v. MendozaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  3. Dobbins v. MendozaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  4. Puget Sound Financial, L.L.C. v. Unisearch, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Puget Sound Financial v. Unisearch, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API