State v. Knox

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Dustin Knox appeals from a judgment entered after he conditionally pled guilty to drug charges, reserving his right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress. Knox argues the district court erred in • denying his motion to suppress because the police officer did not have reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle. We reverse and remand to the district court for findings explaining the basis for denying Knox’s motion to suppress.

I

[¶2] Knox was arrested and charged with possession of a controlled substance, possession of drug paraphernalia and driving while his…