Legal Opinion

Portland & O. C. Ry. Co. v. Sanders

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1917PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From Multnomah: George N. Davis, Judge. Action by the Portland & Oregon City Railway Company, a corporation, against W. A. Sanders and Minnie S. Sanders, his wife, and others, to condemn a right of way for railway purposes. From a verdict and judgment in favor of defendant Sanders and wife, for the sum of $235, they appeal. Department 2. Statement by Mr. Justice Moore.

Read the full summary

From Multnomah: George N. Davis, Judge. Action by the Portland & Oregon City Railway Company, a corporation, against W. A. Sanders and Minnie S. Sanders, his wife, and others, to condemn a right of way for railway purposes. From a verdict and judgment in favor of defendant Sanders and wife, for the sum of $235, they appeal. Department 2. Statement by Mr. Justice Moore. This is an action to condemn a right of way for an electric railroad across the premises of the defendant W. A. Sanders in sections 13 and 14, in township 1 south, range 1 east of the "Willamette Meridian. Commencing at the…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

1, 2. It is contended that an error was committed in denying the motion of Sanders ’ counsel for a postponement of the trial. Supplying the omitted name of a defendant in a criminal action referred to in the affi*66davit in support of the motion the sworn statement for a continuance reads:

“State of Oregon,

County of Multnomah, — ss.

“I, W. A. Sanders, being duly sworn say that I am one of the above named defendants and the owner of the land sought to be appropriated by the plaintiff in the above entitled cause; that I was selected as a member of the jury panel for the January term of the circuit…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. HawkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Nutt v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Brown v. Gold Coin Mining Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Rugenstein v. OttenheimerOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  5. State v. O'NeilOregon Supreme Court · 1886

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. BurkOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  2. State Highway Commission v. BaileyOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  3. State v. JenningsOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  4. State Highway Commission v. ParkerOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. La Grande v. RumelhartOregon Supreme Court · 1926

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API