Legal Opinion

State v. Brown

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 13, 1985No. 22235PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

These cases involve attempts by three defendants to gain suspended sentences conditioned upon their completion of surgical castration. Petitioner Roscoe James Brown moves for the issuance of a writ of mandamus to compel the execution of the suspended sentence. Appellants Michael Braxton and Mark Vaughn seek dismissal of their appeals so that they too may have their suspended sentences carried out. At oral argument, counsel for all three defendants conceded that our disposition of these cases should be the same as to all of them. We hold that the suspension of the sentences conditioned upon…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. KimbroughSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  2. State v. AbbottSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
  3. Weeks v. New York Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
  4. Batchelor v. American Health InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
  5. Stockton v. LeekeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. HuffmanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  2. State v. GleasonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  3. State v. AllenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  4. In re R.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Keenan Reed-Kaliher v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API