Legal Opinion

Yoakum v. Small Claims Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 2, 1975No. Civ. 45940PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THOMPSON, J.

The case at bench presents the issue of the propriety of review by certiorari and mandamus of action of a small claims court adverse to a plaintiff’s motion for relief from default pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 473. We conclude that mandamus is appropriate to compel the small claims court to hear from the plaintiff on the motion but not to review factual determinations on the motion after an adequate hearing.

Michael E. Yoakum filed three actions in the Small Claims Court of the Los Angeles Judicial District to recover costs on bail bond forfeitures.

Actions…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. San Francisco Unified School District v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Burtnett v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Rodman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. County of Ventura v. TillettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  2. New York Times Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. Charlton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Hartley v. Will County Board of ReviewAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  5. Campbell v. CoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API