Legal Opinion
Casey v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 3, 1951No. 12387_1PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SOLOMON, District Judge.
Appellants were jointly indicted for violating provisions of the Federal Communications Act, 47 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq., hereinafter referred to as the “Act.” The indictment contained seven counts.
The first three counts charged that the appellants violated § 301 of the Act in that they “did unlawfully, willfully, and knowingly use and operate certain apparatus for the transmission of energy, communications, and signals by radio without a station license” issued by the Federal Communications Commission, hereinafter called the “’Commission.” In one of such counts, the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- National Broadcasting Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Federal Radio Comm'n v. Nelson Brothers Bond & Mortgage Co. (Station WIBO)Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Connolly v. MedalieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- Armstrong v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
- In Re NassettaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- United States v. Michael William CleggCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Carol Ann Goldstein, United States of America v. Toby RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Charles T. MaudeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- People v. LoignonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.