Legal Opinion
Vermouth v. Corrothers
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 9, 1987No. 86-1796PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NELSON, Circuit Judge:
Jon W. Vermouth appeals from the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1982) petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenging the decision of the United States Parole Commission (“Commission”) that he serve his sentence until its expiration without parole. Vermouth contends that the Commission’s application of the revised 1984 parole guidelines to his parole determination denied him his right to equal protection and violated the ex post facto clause of the Constitution. We note jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Verm…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Luchai Ruviwat v. William French Smith, Attorney General of the U.S. And Robert Christensen, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Conklin Wallace v. Robert ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Bailey v. GardebringCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Charles F. Smith v. United States Parole Commission U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Armando John Vargas v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Allen v. WoodDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1997
- United States Ex Rel. Sequoia Orange Co. v. Sunland Packing House Co.District Court, E.D. California · 1995
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.