Legal Opinion

Cormier v. Willis

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 26, 2012No. A11A1975PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MCFADDEN, Judge.

This appeal is from the grant of summary judgment to a defendant in a dog-bite case. Because the evidence shows that the defendant neither owned nor kept the dog, we affirm.

Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issues of material fact remain and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. On appeal, we review a trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, construing the evidence and all inferences drawn from it in a light favorable to the nonmovant.

(Citations and punctuation omitted.) Stolte v. Hammack, 311 Ga. App. 710 (716 SE2d 796) (2011).

So…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kensington Partners, LLC v. Beal Bank NevadaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  2. Thorsen v. SaberSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  3. Johnston v. WarendhCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  4. COOSA VALLEY TECHNICAL COLLEGE v. WestCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  5. Stolte v. HammackCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. MATTA-TRONCOSO Et Al. v. TYNER.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
  2. Sweeney v. LoweCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  3. David Sweeney v. Michelle D. LoweCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  4. Woodstone Townhouses, LLC v. Southern Fiber Worx, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API