Legal Opinion

People v. Murphy

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 19, 1936No. Crim. 1491PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The defendants have appealed from judgments of conviction of the offenses of unlawfully selling shares of stock of a mining corporation without having procured a license therefor, contrary to the provisions of the Corporate Securities Act of California. (Stats. 1917, p. 673, and amendments; 2 Deering’s Gen. Laws, p. 1924, Act 3814.) They have also appealed from the order denying their motion for a new trial.

It is contended the verdicts and judgments of conviction are not supported by the evidence; that the court was guilty of prejudicial misconduct, and that it erred in admitting evidence in…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Wenban Estate, Inc. v. HewlettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Erkenbrecher v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. People v. PaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. People v. McCallaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  5. Englebretson v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. FigueroaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  2. People v. HorowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. People v. MillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. People v. SidwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. People v. ParkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API