Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided June 17, 1998No. 07-97-0415-CRPublishedCited by 111 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUINN, Justice.

This appeal is representative of a problem repeatedly encountered. It involves the failure of one convicted of a crime to prosecute her appeal with due diligence. Often, the appellant is free on bond during the appeal. Under this situation, there is little impetus to prosecute the matter for the longer it is delayed the longer she is certain to remain free. And, though the rules of appellate procedure address some instances of delay, all instances are not expressly covered. This may be the reason why Rule 2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure was enacted, which we invoke…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Eichelberger v. EichelbergerTexas Supreme Court · 1979

3Cited by111 opinions

  1. Winchester v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2008
  2. Kent v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1999
  3. Peralta v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2002
  4. Finlan v. Peavy, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2006
  5. Meyer v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2010

106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API