Legal Opinion

Cummins v. Rachner

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 19, 1977No. 46778PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TODD, Justice.

Eloise E. Adams was a passenger in an automobile operated by Mary Jane Ra-chner. Mrs. Rachner was proceeding west on Highway No. 12, a divided highway, approaching the city of St. Paul. It was nighttime and snowing. She entered an area of highway construction being performed by Foley Brothers, Inc., (Foley) for the State of Minnesota. In a construction bypass area, Mrs. Rachner became confused by lane markings painted on the road surface and drove her vehicle over the median into the eastbound lane of traffic where it collided with a vehicle being driven by Timothy C. Flynn.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fussner v. AndertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  2. Poppenhagen v. SORNSIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  3. State v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  4. Goblirsch v. Western Land Roller Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. Dornack v. Barton Construction CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Zinnel v. Berghuis Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Kenna v. So-Fro Fabrics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  3. Jones v. FisherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. Cumming v. Nielson's, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Gravley v. Sea Gull Marine, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API