Legal Opinion

In Re Peacock

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided September 4, 1981No. 19-11146PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

WALTER J. KRASNIEWSKI, Bankruptcy Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the Motion of Commercial National Bank of Tiffin, Ohio (Commercial), a creditor and interested party in the above entitled action, for an order granting an extension of time within which to file objections to the Discharge of the Debtors. It is the decision of this Court that the motion is not well taken and should be denied.

On April 10, 1981, Debtors filed a joint voluntary petition for an order for relief under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code. On May 1, 1981, the Clerk of this Court mailed to the Debtors, their…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. First & Peoples National Bank v. Young (In Re Young)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1979
  2. In Re BreiningUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1980
  3. In Re WebbUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 1981
  4. In Re GarchinskyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Continental Builders v. McElmurry (In Re McElmurry)District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1982
  2. Biederman Ex Rel. Chester & Biederman v. Oury, Declemente & Mizdol (In Re Biederman)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
  3. Mason & Lawrence of Ohio, Inc. v. Digby (In Re Digby)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1983
  4. In Re NowackiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1984
  5. Young v. Martin (In Re Young)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API