Legal Opinion

In Re Garchinsky

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 21, 1979No. 19-10910PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EMIL F. GOLDHABER, Bankruptcy Judge:

The issue before me arises from the application of the New Jersey National Bank (“the bank”), a creditor of Roger J. Gar-chinsky (“the bankrupt”), to extend, nunc pro tune, the time for filing a complaint objecting to the bankrupt’s discharge. We will deny the application.

The bank had notice (as did all creditors) that the last day for filing complaints objecting to the bankrupt’s discharge was July 24, 1979. But the application to extend the time for filing such complaints was not filed until October 18, 1979. In an effort to avoid the consequences…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Matter of HeywardUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1981
  2. Menna v. Murphy (In Re Murphy)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1979
  3. International Playtex, Inc. v. Rapino (In Re Rapino)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1981
  4. In Re NowackiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1984
  5. In Re HinoteUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API