Buntin v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
Erom the LaPorte Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.
Indictment, in the court below, against the appellant and one Arthur Harness, in two counts, the first of which need not be noticed, as no question arises upon it.
The second charged that “Arthur Harness and Marion *39Buntin, on the 8th day of November, 1879, at said county, in a rude, insolent and angry manner, did unlawfully touch one James McMahon, with intent forcibly and feloniously, by violence and putting him in fear, to take from his person the goods and chattels of him, the said James McMahon; contrary,” e,tc.
The appellant was put upon his trial separately, and found guilty by the jury…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Landringham v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Scudder v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Arnold v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
3Cited by8 opinions
- Reinhold v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Dickinson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Morris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1882
- State v. O'KEEFEHawaii Supreme Court · 1961
- Yoder v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.