Reinhold v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Marion Criminal Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.
The appellant and Harry Horton were jointly indicted for conspiracy. They were charged with having conspired, confederated and agreed with each other to commit *469burglary, with the intent to steal, take, and carry away the personal property of Hilton U. Brown.
The indictment was not defective for failing to state the kind or value of the goods intended tobe stolen. Hunter v. State, 29 Ind. 80; Short v. State, 63 Ind. 376; Buntin v. State, 68 Ind. 38.
The defendant filed his affidavit and motion for a change of venue from the county. In opposition to this, the State filed the affidavits of a…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Fahnestock v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
- Grubb v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Binns v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Merrick v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Short v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. McDanielOregon Supreme Court · 1901
- Hauk v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Lanasa v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
- Reynolds v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Masterson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.