Legal Opinion

State v. O'KEEFE

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1961No. 4205PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

MIZUHA, J.

Defendant-appellant, Paul E. O’Keefe, after a jury-trial was found guilty of violating section 288-2 of the Revised Laws of Hawaii 1955 and fined $50.00. The appeal was submitted on the briefs without oral argument.

Specifications of error raised by the defendant are as follows: (1) That the court erred in giving State’s Instruction No. 9 over objection of appellant; (2) that the court erred in failing to grant appellant’s motion for a mistrial following the jury’s request for further explanation of a definition of “consideration” and the court’s indicating…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. . FlackNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Greenfield v. . People of the State of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. State v. BentonDelaware Court of Oyer and Terminer · 1936
  4. State v. VigilNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1928
  5. State v. DerrySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1920

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. BuckleyMontana Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Coogler v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  3. Briones v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Briones v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. ShonHawaii Supreme Court · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API