Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Manley v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1981No. 80-1165PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue presented herein is whether the opinion rendered by Dr. Davies, a non-examining physician, was properly utilized by the Industrial Commission in its denial of appellant’s motion for a permanent and total disability award.

In State, ex rel. Wallace, v. Indus. Comm. (1979), 57 Ohio *42St. 2d 55, this court discussed the purpose of the opinion of a non-examining physician in a case before the Industrial Commission. This court stated, at page 59: “[T]he non-examining physician is required to expressly accept all the findings of the examining physicians, but not the opinion drawn therefrom.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Wallace v. Industrlal CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State ex rel. Kramer v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State ex rel. Mees v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State ex rel. Rachow v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Gatlin v. Yellow Freight System, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State ex rel. Berry v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State ex rel. Meeks v. Ohio Brass Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State ex rel. Peeples v. Farley Paving Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API