Legal Opinion
Bearden v. Commissioner
District Court, D. Utah
Decided December 6, 1983No. Civ. C-83-1022WPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
WINDER, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the Commissioner of Internal Revenue’s (the Commissioner) motion for summary judgment. That motion and a supporting memorandum were filed on November 2, 1983. Kelly L. Bearden (the plaintiff) has failed to respond to the Commissioner’s motion within the period allowed by Rule 5(e) of the Civil Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Utah. The court, therefore, must resolve this motion without the benefit of the plaintiff’s argument.
The undisputed facts of this case are few…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Phillips v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Garner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Kahn, Emily v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Whitney v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Sharon D. Welch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Thomas G. Baskin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Milazzo v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.