Legal Opinion

Thomas G. Baskin v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 19, 1984No. 84-5031PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

Thomas Baskin appeals pro se from an order of the District Court 1 granting the government’s motion for summary judgment in Baskin’s action for a refund of a tax penalty assessed against him pursuant to 26 U.S.C.A. § 6702 (West Pocket Part 1984). We affirm.

In April 1983, Baskin wrote his name, address, signature, and the date on a Form 1040, the U.S. Individual Tax Return. He typed asterisks in the other spaces on the form and noted that he was objecting on the basis of the Fifth Amendment. 2 A notation at the top of the form stated that Baskin would complete the form if he could be shown how…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Zicarelli v. New Jersey State Commission of InvestigationSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Donald John Rechtzigel v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
  4. Martin J. Ueckert v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
  5. Bearden v. CommissionerDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1983

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Kahn, Emily v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  2. Lucian T. Zell, II v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  3. Michael W. Lovell and Phyllis D. Lovell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  4. Richard D. May v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  5. Allen W. Jolly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API