Legal Opinion
Flaherty v. Halter
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided March 29, 2001No. CIV 00-788 ADM/RLEPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MONTGOMERY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the undersigned United States District Judge pursuant to Plaintiff Barbara J. Flaherty's Objections [Doc. No. 17] to the Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) of United States Magistrate Judge Raymond L. Erickson [Doc. No. 16]. The R & R, dated February 16, 2001, recommends that Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 6] be denied and that Defendant William A. Halter’s 1 Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 13] be granted. Plaintiff objects to the R & R’s conclusion that the Administrative Law…
2Cases cited76 opinions
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Clarence WALTERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Lorraine POLASKI, Et Al., Appellees, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Wayne R. Hartranft v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Meissl v. BarnhartDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2005
- Wiszowaty v. AstrueDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2012
- Gaspard v. Social Security Administration, CommissionerDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2009
- Veal v. Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2009
- Skeens v. AstrueDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2012
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.