Legal Opinion

Veal v. Social Security Administration

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided May 21, 2009No. 1:07-cv-00901PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

THAD HEARTFIELD, District Judge.

The Court heretofore ordered that this matter be referred to the Honorable Earl S. Hines, United States Magistrate Judge, for consideration pursuant to applicable law and orders of this Court. The Court has received and considered the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to such order, along with the record, pleadings and all available evidence. No objections to the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the parties.

Accordingly, the…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Paul W. Douglass v. United Services Automobile AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  5. Barnhart v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Albaba v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2019
  2. Ardoin v. BerryhillDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2020
  3. Armstrong v. BerryhillDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2020
  4. Blauch v. KijakaziDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  5. Brumley v. SaulDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2021

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API