Beattie v. McMullen
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Action by a contractor to recover for alleged extra work and material furnished, brought to and tried by the Superior Court in New Haven County, Skumivay, ./., upon demurrers to the complaint; the court sustained the demurrers and rendered judgment for the defendants, and the plaintiffs appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
The plaintiffs are dealers in granite. The defendants, McMullen, Weand and McDermott, are contractors in bridge building. The defendant, The Connecticut River Bridge and Highway District, is a public corporation composed of certain towns of this State, organized under a special act of legislature for the purpose of constructing and maintaining a public bridge across the Connecticut River at Hartford, and- acting by a board of commissioners. 12 Special Laws, p. 485.
The substituted complaint, as afterward amended, contains these allegations:—
“ 3. On the 7th day of November, 1903, the plaintiffs…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Meredith v. RomanMontana Supreme Court · 1914
- Mahoney v. Hartford Investment CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
- Cruthers v. DonahueSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- Casey v. McFarlane Bros. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
- Beattie v. McMullenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.