Van Sickle v. Franklin
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Woodward County; Jas. B. Cullison, Judge. .Action by Joe Franklin against Elmer Van Sickle and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
GALBRAITH, O.
This action was instituted by the defendant in error, Joe Franklin, the tenant, against the plaintiff in error Elmer Van Sickle, the landlord, and a surety on the attachment bond, for the wrongful issue and service of an attachment order. There was a trial to the court and jury, and a verdict returned for the plaintiff, assessing his damage in the sum of $125. Judgment was rendered upon this verdict, to review which this appeal has been prosecuted.
The facts briefly stated are these: Franklin rented certain agricultural lands of Van Sickle for the year 1911, and again…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sackett v. RoseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Bash v. HowaldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Floyd v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fireman's Fund Insurance Company v. ShawcrossNevada Supreme Court · 1968
- Deep Rock Oil Corporation v. GriffethSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Stumpf v. PedersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Cushman Motor Works Co. v. KelleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- BEASON v. I. E. MILLER SERVICES, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.