Legal Opinion

In Re Schenck

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1994No. OSB 90-113, 93-5; SC S40157Published

1Opinion of the Court

879 P.2d 863 (1994)

320 Or. 94

In re Complaint as to the CONDUCT OF Ronald D. SCHENCK, Accused.

OSB 90-113, 93-5; SC S40157.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted November 3, 1993.

Decided September 9, 1994.

Ronald D. Schenck, accused, argued the cause and filed the briefs in pro. per.

Robert L. Cowling, Bar Counsel, Medford, argued the cause for the Oregon State Bar. Jeffrey D. Sapiro, Disciplinary Counsel, Lake Oswego, filed the response for the Oregon State Bar.

Before GILLETTE, P.J., VAN HOOMISSEN, FADELEY and UNIS, JJ., and RICHARDSON,[*] J. Pro Tem.

2Per curiam

In this disciplinary proceeding, the…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SchenckOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. In Re Complaints as to the Conduct of WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BurrowsOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PiperOregon Supreme Court · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API