Legal Opinion

State v. Shattuck

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 16, 2004No. C6-03-362PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

This case was heard on the court’s oral calendar on November 30, 2004. The *786court has decided the substantive issue but desires briefing on four specific questions relating to remedy.

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

It is the determination of this court that, in accordance with the rule of Blakely v. Washington, — U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), the district court’s imposition of an upward durational departure under Minn.Stat. § 609.109, subd. 4 (2002), from the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines’ presumptive sentence violated appellant’s Sixth…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. City of Duluth v. SaretteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

4Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. NataleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  3. Lopez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  4. State v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  5. State v. ChauvinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API