Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Trefrey

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 4, 1933PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

Warner V. Taylor appeals from a decree of the Probate Court disallowing an item of $20,000 “for services in accordance with special agreement,” for which he asked credit in Schedule B of his first and final account as executor of the will of William F. Trefrey.

When Trefrey died in June, 1929, holding seven hundred sixty-three and fourteen fifteenths shares of stock in W. S. Quinby Company, a corporation engaged in the coffee business, Warner V. Taylor was president of that corporation and one of three executors and trustees under the will of W. S. Quinby, who had died about eight months…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Berman v. CoakleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  2. Security Bank of New York v. CallahanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  3. Bowker v. PierceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  4. Blake v. PegramMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  5. Newell v. WestMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Comstock v. BowlesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  2. Moulton v. ThompsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Richmond v. WohlbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. Corcoran v. ThomasMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
  5. Richardson v. WolcottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API