Legal Opinion

Kenneth Smith v. State of Indiana

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 11, 2013No. 49A02-1212-CR-1017PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NAJAM, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Kenneth Smith appeals the trial court’s order that he pay $1,380 in restitution to William Kirkham. Smith raises a single issue for our review, which we restate as the following two issues:

1. Whether the trial court abused its discretion when it attributed property missing from Kirkham’s house to Smith even though the State did not use that property to secure Smith’s conviction for theft, as a Class D felony; and

2. Whether the trial court adequately considered Smith’s ability to pay $230 per month in restitution when he acknowledged he was paying $240…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Southern Union Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. United States v. Roger Day, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
  5. Kays v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DenehyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  2. State v. RamosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. Logan M. Dull v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. State v. HuffCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2014
  5. Justine Archer v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API