Southern Union Co. v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sotomayor
The Sixth Amendment reserves to juries the determination of any fact, other than the fact of a prior conviction, that increases a criminal defendant’s maximum potential sentence. Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U. S. 466 (2000); Blakely v. Washington, 542 U. S. 296 (2004). We have applied this principle in numerous cases where the sentence was imprisonment or death. The question here is whether the same rule applies to sentences of criminal fines. We hold that it does.
I
Petitioner Southern Union Company is a natural gas distributor. Its subsidiary stored liquid mercury, a hazardous substance, at a…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by184 opinions
- Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Ramos v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
- Hurst v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- United States v. HaymondSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Charles Bruce v. Warden Lewisburg USPCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
179 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.