Legal Opinion

State v. Huff

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided October 24, 2014No. 110750PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Powell, J.:

According to the United States Supreme Court, with the exception of any prior conviction, the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution requires that “any fact that increases tire penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.” Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490, 120 S. Ct. 2348, 147 L. Ed. 2d 435 (2000). Wendy Huff argues in tire present appeal that the district court violated this directive when it imposed restitution without requiring the State to prove to a jury whether her actions…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Oregon v. IceSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. State v. IvorySupreme Court of Kansas · 2002

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. RobisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021
  2. In re E.S.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
  3. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
  4. State v. LyonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API