Legal Opinion
Imperium (IP) Holdings, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided January 28, 2013No. Case No. 4:11-CV-163PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Adopting Report and Recommendation re Indefiniteness of '884, '651, & '715 Patents
RON CLARK, District Judge.
This matter was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, and he has recommended that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment of indefindteness regarding United States Patent No. 6,271,884, U.S. Patent No. 6,838,651, and U.S. Patent No. 6,838,715 be granted in part and denied in part [Doc. # 181; Doc. # 210]. These patents relate to digital cameras and camcorders and the sensor arrays used therein. Having received the recommendation of the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Benito RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Haynes v. CrenshawDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2016
- MicroPairing Technologies LLC v. General Motors LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2022