Legal Opinion

State v. Lynch

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 2, 1980No. 31PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

The question we address upon this appeal is whether the evidence of the crime of bigamy is sufficient to withstand defendant’s motion'for nonsuit. We hold the evidence insufficient to go to the jury, and defendant’s motion for nonsuit should have been granted.

Upon a motion for nonsuit in a criminal action, all of the evidence favorable to the State, whether competent or incompetent, must be considered. Such evidence must be taken as true and considered in the light most favorable to the State. Discrepancies and contradictions are disregarded, and the State is entitled to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. State v. CutlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. State v. WitherspoonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  5. State v. . PattersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1842

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States v. Catherine Yvonne AckerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  2. Fulton v. VickeryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Hayes v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  4. McDevitt v. StacyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Haymore v. Thew Shovel Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API