Legal Opinion

Hayes v. Fowler

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 6, 1996No. COA94-893PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN, Judge.

Petitioners and respondents each appeal certain aspects of the trial court’s order reviewing a decision of the Pinehurst Board of Adjustment (the Board). For the reasons set out below, we affirm the trial court.

Relevant procedural and factual information is as follows: On 4 April 1994, L. Pendleton Hayes and husband, Edward Whalen (petitioners), applied to respondent Sam Fowler, Village of Pinehurst building inspector (Fowler), for a permit allowing renovations to a historic home (“Maryhurst”) which they had contracted to purchase. The owner of the property was the Catholic…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Coastal Ready-Mix Concrete Co. v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. MATTER OF CMTY. SYNAGOGUE v. BatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. Woodhouse v. Bd. of Com'rs of Town of Nags HeadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Capricorn Equity Corp. v. Town of Chapel Hill Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  5. State v. RichardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Whiteco Outdoor Advertising v. Johnston County Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  2. Great Lakes Society v. Georgetown Charter TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Dare County Board of Education v. SakariaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  4. JWL Investments, Inc. v. Guilford County Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  5. Williams v. Alexander County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API