Haymore v. Thew Shovel Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORR, Judge.
I
Plaintiff contends that the trial court erred by not ruling as a matter of law that Koehring was the apparent manufacturer of the subject boom brake cylinder. We believe that the trial judge was correct in allowing the jury to decide this question.
This Court considered a similar scenario in Warzynski v. Empire Comfort Systems, Inc., 102 N.C. App. 222, 401 S.E.2d 801 (1991). Warzynski involved a Spanish manufacturer of gas heaters, Safel-Inelsa Orbaiceta, S.A. (Safel), which sold in the United States through Empire Comfort Systems (Empire). Plaintiff contended that their Empire gas…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Woodson v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- State v. WeeksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. LedfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Murrow v. DanielsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. AgnewSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Whiteside Estates, Inc. v. Highlands Cove, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Roberts v. YoungCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- Sparks v. Oxy-Health, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2015
- McDevitt v. StacyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Taft v. Brinley's Grading Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.