Legal Opinion

Doe v. Bridgeport Police Department

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided January 18, 2001No. CIV.A. No. 3:00CV2167JCHPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*327RULING ON PLAINTIFFS’ APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION [DKT. NO. 1] AND MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION [DKT. No. 24]

HALL, District Judge.

*328The plaintiffs John Doe and John Roe1 bring a putative class action, on behalf of themselves and a class of similarly situated injecting drug users, against the Bridgeport Police Department and its chief, Wilber L. Chapman, in his official capacity, for violation of the plaintiffs’ fourth amendment rights to be free from illegal search and seizures, false arrest and malicious prosecution. The Connecticut Harm Reduction Coalition, a nonprofit…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Diane Blair v. Scott Specialty Gases Thomas Barford Jerry StumpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  2. Davis v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  3. Davis v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  4. Dehoyos v. Allstate Corp.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2007
  5. Ankrom v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API