Legal Opinion

State v. Wallace, 05 Ma 172 (6-22-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 22, 2007No. 05 MA 172PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Dana Wallace appeals the decision of the Youngstown Municipal Court which found that he violated his probation. Appointed counsel filed a no merit brief listing no arguable issues, and appellant failed to file his own assignments of error. After conducting our independent file review, we have concluded that counsel is permitted to withdraw, and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

{¶ 2} This appeal involves four separate case numbers originating out of the Youngstown Municipal Court. On April 11, 2003, appellant was cited for…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State v. ToneyOhio Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. State ex rel. Coulverson v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. CoffmanOhio Supreme Court · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. BaileyOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. State v. HarianOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Gruger v. Diversified Air Sys., 07-Ma-52 (6-30-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. State v. BeringerOhio Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API