Legal Opinion

Gruger v. Diversified Air Sys., 07-Ma-52 (6-30-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 2008No. 07-MA-52PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Diversified Air Systems (DAS), appeals from a Mahoning County Common Pleas Court judgment ruling in favor of plaintiff-appellee, Walter Gruger, on Gruger's claims for outstanding commissions due and breach of a lease and on DAS's counterclaim, following a bench trial to a magistrate.

{¶ 2} The Phoenix Electric Company (Phoenix) was wholly owned by Gruger. In March 1998, Phoenix entered into an agreement with DAS whereby DAS purchased Phoenix's assets. As part of the consideration, DAS agreed to provide Gruger with a three-year employment agreement.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Hambleton v. R.G. Barry Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Hummel v. HummelOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Doner v. SnappOhio Court of Appeals · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nexus Communications, Inc. v. Qwest Communications Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API