In Re Chmura
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.
This disciplinary matter involves a challenge to the constitutionality of Canon 7(B)(1)(d) of the Code of Judicial Conduct, which governs public communications by candidates for judicial office. 1 We hold that Canon 7(B)(1)(d) is facially unconstitutional. We therefore narrow the canon to prohibit a candidate from either knowingly or recklessly using forms of public communication that are false. Accordingly, we amend Canon 7(B)(1)(d) to provide that a candidate for judicial office: “should not knowingly, or with reckless disregard, use or participate in the use of any form of public…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- George M. Weaver v. Jerry B. BlackstockCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Grievance Administrator v. FiegerMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. GardnerOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- Van Buren Charter Township v. Garter Belt, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- People v. RogersMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.