Legal Opinion

In Re Chmura

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 2000No. 112062, Calendar No. 11PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.

This disciplinary matter involves a challenge to the constitutionality of Canon 7(B)(1)(d) of the Code of Judicial Conduct, which governs public communications by candidates for judicial office. 1 We hold that Canon 7(B)(1)(d) is facially unconstitutional. We therefore narrow the canon to prohibit a candidate from either knowingly or recklessly using forms of public communication that are false. Accordingly, we amend Canon 7(B)(1)(d) to provide that a candidate for judicial office: “should not knowingly, or with reckless disregard, use or participate in the use of any form of public…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. George M. Weaver v. Jerry B. BlackstockCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
  2. Grievance Administrator v. FiegerMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. GardnerOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Van Buren Charter Township v. Garter Belt, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. People v. RogersMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API