Legal Opinion

Great Northern Partnership v. Cuyahoga Co. Bd. of Revision

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 19, 1990No. Case No. 57277Published

1Opinion of the CourtStillman, J.

Plaintiff Great Northern Partnership (hereafter referred to as "GNP") appeals from the dismissal of its tax appeal. As we find that GNP failed to timely meet the mandatory, jurisdictional requirements for perfecting its appeal, we affirm.

I

On March 31, 1987, the City of North Olmsted and the North Olmsted Board of Education (collectively referred to hereafter as "North Olmsted") filed a complaint with the Cuyahoga County Board of Revision (hereafter referred to as the "Board"), seeking an increase in the taxable value of Great Northern Mall. In response, GNP filed a counter-complaint which…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Zier v. Bureau of Unemployment CompensationOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Fulton v. State Ex Rel. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Proctor v. GilesOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Austin Co. v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Townsend v. Bd. of Building AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API