Legal Opinion
State v. Goldfarb
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 20, 1971PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlcorn, C. J.
The state has appealed from a judgment rendered on the overruling of its demurrer to the defendant’s special defense. The only issue, therefore, is whether the pleading demurred to, the allegations of which are assumed to be true for the purposes of this appeal, sets forth a good defense to the state’s action. Cashman v. Meriden Hospital, 117 Conn. 585, 586, 169 A. 915. The complaint sought the recovery of damages against the decedent’s estate on a claim which was not presented within the time limited by order of the Probate Court pursuant to the provisions of General Statutes § 45-205 and…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Grant v. GrantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
- State v. KilburnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
- Estate of Randall v. Colorado State HospitalSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
- Cashman v. Meriden HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Padula v. PadulaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Breen v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Cadle Co. v. D'AddarioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- R.A. Civitello Co. v. City of New HavenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Matey v. Estate of DemberSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Imbesi v. Carpenter Realty Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.