Legal Opinion

Sterling Widmark v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 26, 2006No. 04-35952PublishedCited by 440 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWNING, Circuit Judge:

Sterling Widmark appeals a decision of the district court affirming the Social Security Commissioner’s (“Commissioner”) denial of benefits. An Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) found Widmark, though severely impaired, had the residual functional capacity (“RFC”) for the full range of light work. Widmark argues that, in reaching his decision, the ALJ rejected the medical opinion of an examining physician without offering adequate reasons. Wid-mark also claims the ALJ erred in using the Medical-Voeational Guidelines in making his disability determination.

We have…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Tackett v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. Lester v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. James L. Batson, Sr. v. Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. Carl Edlund v. Larry G. Massanari, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by440 opinions

  1. Carol Luther v. Nancy BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. Augustine Ex Rel. Ramirez v. AstrueDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2008
  3. Padilla v. AstrueDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2008
  4. Miller v. AstrueDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010
  5. Lopez v. ColvinDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2016

435 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API