Legal Opinion
Miller v. Astrue
District Court, C.D. California
Decided January 28, 2010No. CV 08-8226-RCPublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ROSALYN M. CHAPMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Russell R. Miller filed a complaint on December 17, 2008, seeking review of the Commissioner’s decision denying his application for disability benefits. On May 20, 2009, the Commissioner answered the complaint, and the parties filed a joint stipulation on June 19, 2009.
BACKGROUND
On October 31, 2005, plaintiff, who was then 52 years old, applied for disability benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act (“Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 423, claiming an inability to work since May 21, 2004, due to lead poisoning, dementia,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Smolen v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Orn v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Lingenfelter v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Carmickle v. Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Reddick v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- (SS) Adams v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- (SS) Alemzadeh v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- (SS) Ayala v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- (SS) Black v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- (SS) Clark v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.