Legal Opinion

Smith v. City of Aurora

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 16, 1963No. 20515PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr.. Justice Moore

delivered the opinion of the Court.

S. Lee Smith as plaintiff in the trial court filed his complaint attacking the validity of annexation proceedings conducted in the county court of Arapahoe county. He alleged in the complaint that he was an “aggrieved person” within the meaning of C.R.S. 1953, 139-11-6 which provides, inter alia:

“Any person aggrieved by any annexation proceedings had under this article, may apply at any time within ninety days after the effective date of the approving ordinance to the county court of the county in which his land is situated for a hearing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City and County of Denver v. MillerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  2. Tanner v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clark v. City of Colorado SpringsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  2. Wiedenhoft v. City of Michigan CityIndiana Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Purdy v. City of Vestavia HillsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  4. Smith v. City of AuroraSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API