Legal Opinion
Smith v. City of Aurora
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided September 16, 1963No. 20515Published
1Opinion of the Court
385 P.2d 129 (1963)
S. Lee SMITH, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
CITY OF AURORA, a Municipal Corporation, Defendant in Error.
No. 20515.
Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.
September 16, 1963.
Kelley, Inman & Flynn, Denver, for plaintiff in error.
Bernard V. Berardini, George B. Lee, Aurora, for defendant in error.
MOORE, Justice.
S. Lee Smith as plaintiff in the trial court filed his complaint attacking the validity of annexation proceedings conducted in the county court of Arapahoe county. He alleged in the complaint that he was an "aggrieved person" within the meaning of C.R.S.1953, 139-11-6 which provides,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City and County of Denver v. MillerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
- Tanner v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
- Markos v. Cain, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1955
- Smith v. City of AuroraSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963