Wiedenhoft v. City of Michigan City
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, C. J.
This litigation has arisen out of a proposed Urban Renewal Project, number R-46, initiated in the City of Michigan City, Indiana. Essentially, the Project will replace a “blighted area” with newly constructed buildings. The appellant seeks to block this Project, and after an unsuccessful hearing on the matter before the Urban Renewal Commission, he appealed to the LaPorte Circuit Court.
During the trial, evidence was elicited which indicated that the appellant was a depositor-stockholder in the Michigan City Loan and Savings Association, but he did not reside in the area; that he owned no…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Massachusetts v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Alabama Power Co. v. IckesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- McFarland v. PierceIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- City and County of Denver v. MillerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
- Clay v. HamiltonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1945
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Union Township Residents Ass'n v. Whitley County Redevelopment CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
- City of New Haven v. Allen County Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- National Bank & T. Co. of So. Bend v. Moody FordIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
- METROPOLITAN DEV. COM'N OF MARION CO. v. CullisonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
- Brenwick Associates, LLC v. Boone County Redevelopment CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.