Legal Opinion

Glock v. Hillestad

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1957No. 7702PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHNELLER, District Judge.

This action is one brought to quiet title-to certain real estate situated in the City of Bismarck, North Dakota, and is in statutory form. The appellant interposed his original answer, in which he, in substance, made a general denial to the complaint of the plaintiff, admitted that he had an interest in the real property described in the complaint, and counterclaimed for certain work, labor and materials furnished by way of plumbing and heating installed in the premises described in the complaint, and asked for judgment for $1,659.79, and’ that the court impose a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Hotel MelroseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1918
  2. McDonald v. AbrahamNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Browne & Co. v. John P. Sharkey Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Kampman v. Pittsburgh Contracting & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Morley v. McCaskeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Nokota Feeds, Inc. v. State Bank of LakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Ireland's Lumber Yard v. Progressive Contractors, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Ned Nastrom Motors, Inc. v. Nastrom-Peterson-Neubauer Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State Bank of Towner, Inc. v. RauhNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Nelson v. TMH, INC.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API