Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Fry

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 28, 1993No. H010121PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WUNDERLICH, J.

Statement of the Case

Defendant Wade William Fry appeals from a judgment entered after a court trial in which he was found guilty of arson of a structure and four counts of arson of a vehicle. (Pen. Code, § 451, subds. (c) and (d).) The court imposed the four-year midterm sentence for arson of a structure and concurrent two-year midterm sentences for the other arson offenses. The court suspended execution of the sentence and placed defendant on probation for five years on condition that he spend one year in the county jail, crediting him with one hundred and fifteen days…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. HoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. People v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. People v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. People v. GloverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. AtkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. V.V.California Supreme Court · 2011
  3. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. People v. FabrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. People v. BoldenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API