Boedicker v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
J. THOMAS MARTEN, JUDGE
Plaintiff Doug Boedicker brings this action alleging that a debt collection letter sent by Midland Credit Management was false and deceptive under the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act (FDCPA) because the letter did not warn him that payment on the debt could have the effect of renewing the governing statute of limitations period under Kansas law. Both parties have moved for summary judgment. For the reasons provided herein, the court will grant summary judgment in favor of Midland.1
Summary judgment is proper where the pleadings, depositions,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Christ Clomon v. Philip D. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Dayton Hudson Corp. v. Macerich Real Estate Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Baye v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2017
- Heppinstall v. Resurgent Capital Services L.P.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
- Pierre v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018