Legal Opinion

Wofford v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided December 1, 1993No. CA CR 93-36PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John Mauzy Pittman, Judge.

The appellant, Ricky Wof-ford, was convicted by a jury of rape and kidnapping. He was sentenced to ten years imprisonment on the rape charge and five years on the kidnapping charge, the sentences to be served concurrently. His sole argument on appeal is that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction for kidnapping and that the trial court, therefore, erred in denying his motions for a directed verdict of acquittal on that charge. We find no error and affirm.

A motion for directed verdict constitutes a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence. Thomas…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tarentino v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  2. Summerlin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  3. Shaw v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  4. Cook v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  5. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. CarrasquilloSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
  2. Mitchem v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006
  3. State v. LangSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  4. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API